Economy Java Web Services Programming lectures in naturopathic hydrotherapy A History of Asia 6th Edition pdf Fashion and Art The Quintessential PIC® Microcontroller 2nd Edition Corrected. The Holy Bible In Its Original Order by Fred Coulter Main Page • What's New? • Specials • Title Index: A-J • K-Z • View Cart. This new second edition of The Original Order Bible contains a new 32-page commentary section: Understanding the Difficult Words of. An Understandable History of the Bible (3rd Edition) Author: Samuel Gipp Pages: 555, gluebound. King James: His Bible And Its Translators (2nd Edition) $19.95 Further info Remembering Dr. Ruckman About Us About The Bookstore About Dr. Ruckman.On the King James Bible Versus Other Translations Controversy(Tentmaker editor: The following article is an excellent treatment of the King James Bible, often called the “Authorized Version”, versus other English Bible Translations debate. This article contains very valuable information not found in most material on this subject.)For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Hebrews 4: 1. 2 )In my contacts with folks, offline and on the Internet, I frequently encounter people who have a special fondness for the King James Version (KJV) of the English Bible. Some profess to take pleasure from the almost poetic use of 1. English, as I do. Others like the fact that so many aids to study and interpretation are based on the KJV, as I do. Some believe the KJV, also known as the Authorized Version (AV), to be an inspired version, as I do not. There is a body of professing Christians who claim that the AV is the only English version – and I have met a few who claim it is the only version in any language – that truly preserves God's written revelation to mankind as set down in the original autographs. Within this latter group are to be found some who assess the eternal state of others by their choice of Bible version; if they're not using the KJV exclusively, then they're not truly saved. When confronted concerning their excessive zeal for this translation, it is not uncommon for those who hold to KJV- Onlyism to charge that their antagonists are being divisive. Often, they will claim that this "divisiveness" is caused by the "other" versions of the English Bible. Adherents of KJY- Onlyism are very messianic about their choice of Bible versions and often are willing to devote a lot of time and effort to spreading the KJV gospel. As often as not, they will concentrate on "proving" that other versions are tainted due to satanic influence over those who labored to bring them into existence. On those occasions when they attempt to show why the KJV is the better choice, their arguments often tend to rely more on logic or sentiment than theology. You will find that this book is, as its name implies, An Understandable History of the Bible. For seven years it has been 'field tested' in the hands of the common man. From steel worker to Greek scholar, from housewife to missionary, all have been im- pressed. -Samuel Gipp, Gipp's Understandable History of the Bible, Daystar Pulblishing, 2nd Edition, 2000, p. 109, ISBN: 1-890120-13-8. It is then safe to say that Sye believes that anyone who would use the King James Bible, and expose the heresies and. Buy An understandable history of the Bible on Amazon.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders. Interesting, this is not the latest edition of the book. But I purchased a used copy and it was apparently signed by Bro. Gipp. Kinda cool. Comment Was this. The 2nd century Old Latin Vulgate. ANCIENT BIBLE VERSIONS RETURN TO THE OLD PATHS -- excerpt from The Morning Stars LUCIFER: ANGEL OF LIGHT - FATHER OF LIES CORRUPT LEXICONS AND DICTIONARIES. Life Application Study Bible,NLT, also available in large print and personal edition sizes. Printed in the United States of America 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 10987654321. You'll learn the history of the Bible in this well documented but easy to understand book. Introduction to the Second Edition Introduction to the Third Edition Chapter 1 - Time Trip Chapter 2 - Where Do We Go From Here Chapter 3 - The Ground Rules. On the King James Bible Versus Other Translations Controversy Author Unknown (Tentmaker editor. (Samuel C. Gipp, 'An Understandable History of the Bible,' Bible Believers Baptist Bookstore:Macedonia, p. 66) Let's take a few moments to look at the. Not infrequently, they will attack, either directly or by innuendo, the faith or doctrine of those who prefer some other translation to the KJV. I prefer to stay clear of "version fights," which I believe are as often motivated by pride as by reasoned study of the issues. To me, these are similar to strivings over denominational affiliation. In my considered opinion, any time someone's relationship to the Lord is judged on the basis of externals such as church affiliation, Bible choice, etc., personal prejudice is the standard against which that individual is being measured, not sound doctrine. Recently, I stood to one side and watched as some apparently KJV- Only folks preached their KJV gospel to a group of professing Christians, most of whom had only recently heard the call to Christ. As usual, their arguments were centered on proving all other Bible translations to be false, while expecting the KJV to be accepted simply because it was the right thing to do. Those in the KJVO camp, while admitting for the most part that they had used other translations early in their Christian walk, were intolerant of the fact that most of those to whom they were preaching their cause were young in the faith and that some of these were still struggling with vestiges of old beliefs and habits. I saw little tenderness or compassion; little of that Christian love we so like to boast of. What I saw was harsh language, bitterness, invective, ad hominems, and other "arguments" generally favored by those who lack convincing evidence to support their stand. This is poor polemics, for it is does little to convince the antagonist that his position is flawed and, in fact, tends to harden his opposition. It is far easier to attack one's opponent on a personal level than it is to show what is "wrong" with his position or to advance irrefutable evidence in support of one's own stand. When it became apparent that some of those targeted by the KJV- Only assault team were suffering injury as a consequence of the unrelenting barrage, I stepped in and made a half- hearted effort to either end the exchange or shift the focus. I enlisted the support of a gentle believer who strongly favors the KJV, but does not consider choice of translation to be a watershed issue in assessing the faith of another. He made several attempts, calling upon the Scriptures for support, to end the increasingly harsh exchanges - - to no avail. Once the KJV- Only juggernaut starts rolling, it is quite difficult to stop. I decided to examine the KJV- Only position in detail; something I had never done before. Who knows? Maybe these folks have the right understanding and the KJV is the only Bible translation that perfectly preserves God's revelation as breathed to the inspired writers of the original autographs. For my limited study, I chose to go with some of the more- often- quoted exponents of KJV- Onlyism. What I found were mostly value- laden arguments that depended more on appeals to emotionalism than to facts. The majority of the items I read appeared targeted to readers looking for nothing more than confirmation of strongly held beliefs. One theme I encountered several times had to do with the alleged divisiveness of those who preferred some other translation to the Authorized Version. After reading that argument a few times, I sat quietly for a few minutes and tried to remember the last time I recalled anyone who used a translation other than the KJV trying to shove his favorite down someone else's throat. After a few minutes, I gave up the effort. I could think of not a single incident. In my observation, it seems that it is those who have some special attachment to the KJV who tend to foster divisions within the Body of Christ. I cannot recall ever observing someone who prefers the NASB pointing an accusing finger at another person who happens to prefer the RSV and fairly screaming, "Heretic! The Bible you are using is not inspired." I don't recall ever observing someone with an NIV in his hand ever saying to someone holding a KJV that he would never find Christ using THAT Bible. I cannot recall ever observing someone holding one of those "other" English translations bringing a brother or sister to tears over his or her choice of translations. I have seen KJV- Only types do that often. On the other hand, I have observed a great number of people who appear to almost worship their KJV as much as a devout Roman Catholic might worship the Virgin Mary - - not with the same degree of worship as rendered to God, but worship nevertheless. This excessive reverence for, not the Bible, mind you, but for a particular translation of the Bible, might constitute bibliolatry. Not an accusation, just something to think on. Is one's salvation determined by his choice of Bible version? Can someone who is saved by faith lose that salvation when he fails to cleave to the KJV? I submit that one's choice of translation is not a salvation issue and does not merit the incredible amount of effort, time and emotion that KJV- Only people seem so willing to devote to pushing their preferred version. I use the KJV more than any other version, but I do not use it exclusively. I do not use it because I believe it to be inspired or more faithful to the autographs than any other version. I remind the reader that no copies of the autographs have survived and copies were used in preparing not only the KJV but almost all other versions in, I should think, all other languages as well as English. As I understand it, one of the big reasons why folks have this special fondness for the KJV is that it is based on the Textus Receptus, which they claim is based on the great majority (9. Greek manuscripts. This understanding is important to their claim that the Textus Receptus is based on the oldest Greek manuscripts – the ones closest to the autographs. The reasoning here being that the nearer a manuscript is to the originals time- wise, the less likely it is to have been corrupted by repeated copying, editing, etc. Seems to make sense. Quoting Zane Hodges of the Dallas Theological Seminary] "'Thus the Majority text, upon which the King James Version is based, has in reality the strongest claim possible to be regarded as an authentic representation of the original text. This claim is quite independent of any shifting consensus of scholarly judgment about its readings and is based on the objective reality of its dominance in the transmissional history of the New Testament text." (Samuel C. Gipp, "An Understandable History of the Bible," Bible Believers Baptist Bookstore: Macedonia, p. Let's take a few moments to look at the Textus Receptus (TR). During the first 1. Christ's substitutionary sacrifice, manuscript copies of the biblical texts were available in Hebrew and Greek. There were also plenty of Latin translations of the texts. Folks working on a translation would draw from these sources in any combination. Bear in mind that these ancient translators had the Hebrew Tanakh (our Old Testament), the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures known as the Septuagint, the Greek New Testament and the Latin translations based on all three of the other sources. The translators of antiquity commonly used translations of translations in coming up with their own new translations. Then, in 1. 51. 5, A Dutch humanist and scholar named Desiderius Erasmus put together a Greek version of the New Testament. In his work, he used existing Greek manuscripts. How many manuscripts did Erasmus have to work with? Some KJV- Only folks claim there were some 5,0. Erasmus' time. I have no reason to doubt that figure. How many of these was the scholar able to make use of? Remember, that was in the days before closed circuit TV, fax machines, email, Federal Express, jumbo jets, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2016
Categories |